• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Google Earth Blog

The amazing things about Google Earth

  • Home
  • About
  • Basics
  • Links
  • Tips
  • 3D Models
  • Sightseeing
  • Videos

New Imagery for Google Earth – October 23

October 23, 2007

Niagara Falls in 3D in Google Earth[UPDATE Oct 24: – Yesterday Google posted another series of riddles suggesting some of the locations. Today they not only provided the answers, they also provided a complete list of all the major locations with new imagery. Look at the bottom of this post for the full list. I’m very glad to see Google post a more complete list of imagery updates. The recent trend of doing riddles is fun, but give us the full information and we are more likely to look at places with new data.]
A bunch of new imagery for Google Earth has been released. This came to my attention courtesy of an E-mail from GEB reader Artak in Germany. No word yet from Google on the official list, but here is a summary of places found so far (the list started by folks at the KugelErde.de – German Google Earth forum, others added as reports come in – and as I find them):

  • Germany – Wilhelmshaven, Hamburg, Lübeck, Travemünde, Timmendorfer Strand, Münster, Magdeburg, Chemnitz, Stuttgart, Rostock, Erfurt, Freiburg, Saarbrücken, Sylt, Aurich, Wiesmor, Mellum, Wangerooge, Spiekeroog, Langeoog, Norderney, Juist, Memmert, Borkum, Wiesmoor
  • Netherlands
  • Yerevan, Armenia
  • Tunisia
  • Syria
  • Oregon, USA
  • Marshall Islands, French Polynesia
  • North Carolina, USA joins the list of entire state coverage with high resolution imagery
  • At least portions of Puerto Rico are updated – the blimp has moved.
  • Leeds, UK
  • Reykjavik, Iceland
  • Derby, England
  • Gettysburg, Pennsylvania and substantial portions of Pennsylvania
  • Niagara Falls, New York

Also, according to GEB reader Dan Saxton, Canada has much better 3D terrain now.
This is the second imagery update in October. A highly unusual occurrence. Usually it’s about 60 days between imagery updates.

About Frank Taylor

Frank Taylor started the Google Earth Blog in July, 2005 shortly after Google Earth was first released. He has worked with 3D computer graphics and VR for many years and was very impressed with this exciting product. Frank completed a 5.5 year circumnavigation of the earth by sailboat in June 2015 which you can read about at Tahina Expedition, and is a licensed pilot, backpacker, diver, and photographer.

  • More Posts(1963)

Filed Under: Google Earth News, Sightseeing

Reader Interactions






PLEASE NOTE: Google Earth Blog is no longer writing regular posts. As a result, we are not accepting new comments or questions about Google Earth. If you have a question, use the official Google Earth and Maps Forums or the Google Earth Community Forums.

Comments

  1. Adonet says

    October 23, 2007 at 4:35 pm

    Good news! but i’m waiting for a update of Spain 🙁

  2. Dan Saxton says

    October 23, 2007 at 4:57 pm

    Please also note that much of PA has high-res imagery now, most notably the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre area, which has long been ignored till now.
    Also, check out Canada! They’ve updated their 3D terrain and what used to be the worst 3D in the world is now vastly improved! Vancouver, BC mtns are especially impressive.

  3. Agnarkb says

    October 23, 2007 at 4:58 pm

    Looks like PA got updated

  4. Agnarkb says

    October 23, 2007 at 5:03 pm

    The Reykjavík update has old pictures 🙁

  5. Maarten says

    October 23, 2007 at 6:13 pm

    I checked lots of spots in the Netherlands. The imagery is the same, but the colors/contrast has been changed. Untill today in Amsterdam there were parts in different contrast. Now all of the Netherlands has the same colors (gamma, contrast, how do I say it in English…).
    And honestly: it looks great!

  6. Maarten says

    October 23, 2007 at 6:20 pm

    But I’m a little disappointed that there still is no high-res imagery for Slovenia, one of the most beautiful countries in Europe…
    Only the capital Ljubljana is in high-res, the coastal area and a few other spots, but most of the country is in poor low-res quality…

  7. Jimmy_Lemon says

    October 23, 2007 at 6:20 pm

    The new imagery for Derby, England is very recent it seems 🙂 I haven’t been there for a few months and from what I can see of the construction of the new shopping centre/mall it looks like I saw it, don’t think it can be more than 4-5 months old, which is always nice to see 🙂

  8. Erik says

    October 23, 2007 at 7:07 pm

    STILL no update for Hamilton/Cambridge region of New Zealand. This has been the lowest quality since GE started! I wanna see my house! 😛

  9. Noel_B says

    October 23, 2007 at 8:09 pm

    I agree that Reykjavik is an older image cleaned up. No imagary for Ireland, Scotland, Isle of Man, but I think Swansea Wales gets new images.
    Maybe I never noticed before, But Tunisia is all CNES/spot image. Syria got a cnes/spot update too (although not clear enough to see recent Attack). Cyprus get full coverage too.

  10. Rich says

    October 23, 2007 at 8:51 pm

    WHYYYYYYY won’t they update Scotland? *sob* There are clouds over all the places I want to look at!

  11. alan says

    October 23, 2007 at 9:00 pm

    Not sure if your list entry of Niagara Falls is supposed to refer to the picture posted, but if so, the Horseshoe Falls lie in Ontario, Canada, not New York as the list says. The American Falls are northeast of the Canadian falls, past Luna Island.

  12. mlo says

    October 23, 2007 at 9:06 pm

    Blah. The picture of my house is still at least four years old.

  13. Luke W says

    October 23, 2007 at 9:35 pm

    Looks like there has been NO update to any of Australia this time around. 🙁

  14. Patrick says

    October 23, 2007 at 10:30 pm

    I just found that Cuyahoga County, OH has been updated with new imagery. It appears to be high res now, which is great.

  15. Christine Smith says

    October 23, 2007 at 11:15 pm

    Google Earth, if you are reading this, would you please provide a 3-D image for Iguasu Falls? They are beautiful.

  16. John Sapyta says

    October 24, 2007 at 12:13 am

    I can’t tell if my area has been upadated, by the looks of the image, it hasn’t. Anyone know how you can tell if an area has been updated?

  17. Martyn says

    October 24, 2007 at 4:59 am

    The 9th clue, “9) You can tour the Royal Navy’s first iron-hulled, armor-plated warship in this town.” refers to the imagery update for Portsmouth, UK, not Leeds UK, as stated.

  18. Athanasios Anastasiou says

    October 24, 2007 at 5:11 am

    Except Leeds, Plymouth – UK was also updated, but it does not appear in the list of updated locations. :-/
    This city and some of the surrounding area, is changing fast.

  19. azzimd says

    October 24, 2007 at 7:19 am

    Lebanon now has full coverage

  20. Sam says

    October 24, 2007 at 8:05 am

    I feel very disappointing about the very low resolution coverage of the most beautiful country in the world : Ireland. And it’s always the same thing after each update. Scotland is in the same problem.
    However, the progressive coverage of US State (Oregon, North Carolina this time), it’s a good news.

  21. Ruairi says

    October 24, 2007 at 10:54 am

    The google maps of Belfast (Ireland) are about 6 years old. Is there a definitive list of all map updates?

  22. Geoff Coupe says

    October 24, 2007 at 11:13 am

    Still no decent resolution for the vast majority of Scotland! This is beginning to get tiresome.

  23. Kevin says

    October 24, 2007 at 12:34 pm

    Adonet is waiting for an “update” of Spain, how lucky you are to be in that position. I am waiting for initial basic coverage of Ireland, even the greater dublin area would be nice (40% of the total population live in Dublin and the three surrounding rural counties). I thought Dublin was supposed to be the second biggest google centre on the planet. Dont get me wrong all the extra content features are superb but the 99% quality shot of west dublin taken in april 2007 should be a priority release even just to put Google on par with yahoo maps. The release of coverage for Navan and Drogheda just north of Dublin in the summer is appreciated.

  24. stuart says

    October 24, 2007 at 1:25 pm

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh…give us some denver and the foothills.
    please.

  25. Graham Till says

    October 24, 2007 at 2:48 pm

    New Imagery for Exeter and East Devon also Portsmouth and Chatam areas.

  26. Sam says

    October 24, 2007 at 6:54 pm

    A large part of Mediterranean coast of France (Languedoc-Roussillon Coast and Camargue) has new imagery 🙂

  27. Frans says

    October 25, 2007 at 3:43 am

    The imagery for the Netherlands, like a previous poster said, is indeed exactly the same as it was before, except that they give all the different patches more or less the same color sceme, which is quite amazing actually; and it looks a lot fresher than before, the greens are greener and the water is much blueer. Still, most of the imagery is already two years old, I hope all the work they put in this face-lift doesn’t mean we’ll have to wait much longer for a real update.

  28. zebs says

    October 25, 2007 at 8:12 am

    “2) Every year, this city plays host to the U.K.’s largest outdoor (temporary) ice rink”
    Think thats Leicester… atleast the Leicestershire images have been updated.

  29. stefbra says

    October 25, 2007 at 12:47 pm

    What about central Poland? Lodz aglomeration (1 million residents) has no high-res coverage. Even yahoo maps has it.

  30. Markus says

    October 25, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    It’s wonderful how more and more regions are updated and I am extremely grateful for the fact google earth exists, but it’s a shame vienna, austria a rapidly growing city with a populatin of about 2 million still has imagery of at least 2003 with clouds all over and hasn’t been updated since septemer 2005 (that update was the one which made everything worse). PLEASE Google Earth, why do you update germany but leave out its wealthier (and more beuatiful ;)) also geman speaking nighbouring country austria?

  31. Riley says

    October 25, 2007 at 3:27 pm

    Where is this “Castilla (Colombia)” that they refer to in the updates?

  32. Andysnat says

    October 25, 2007 at 6:43 pm

    For what its worth, the approximately seven year old image of Sedgefield has been updated with something very recent.

  33. Chris says

    October 25, 2007 at 7:15 pm

    Excellent new images of places like Portsmouth in England, but why is most of the magnificent terrains of Wales and Scotland, aside from new images of Edinburgh, still at low resolution? Are there problems over copyright or royalties with government agencies or commercial publishers?

  34. Ivan says

    October 26, 2007 at 3:46 am

    I wonder when are they going to update more than 6 years old imagery of Chicago, IL?

  35. Thomasasz says

    October 26, 2007 at 10:48 am

    Lithuania’s maps haven’t been updated for years 🙁
    Vilnius’s imagery is 5years old!!! 🙁

  36. J says

    October 27, 2007 at 3:17 pm

    Well it looks like for once I’m the one happy with the update and everyone else isn’t!
    Been waiting YEARS for Pennsylvania. Thanks, Google — I would have probably had an aneurysm if the poor state was passed up yet again 😉

  37. mekifo says

    October 27, 2007 at 7:50 pm

    El Paso still isn’t updated
    The Imagery is almost 6 years old

  38. Singeo says

    October 28, 2007 at 11:09 pm

    Unfortunately imagery of Singapore has gone backwards.
    http://www.singeo.com.sg/?p=170

  39. Ted says

    October 29, 2007 at 9:35 am

    Finally we can see the Neuschwanstein castle!
    There still is a very small part of southern Germany not in high-res.

  40. vanessa stead says

    October 30, 2007 at 4:48 am

    Why is it that the pictures are over four years old when will it all be updated.

  41. marc says

    October 30, 2007 at 8:33 am

    I’m not happy with the new imagery of the Netherlands. Although the contrast is better and the zoomed-out map doesn’t look like patchwork anymore, zoomed-in the resolution is worse than the previous imagery.

  42. Jonathan says

    October 31, 2007 at 2:41 pm

    Has the Las Vegas coverage gotten worse?

  43. Frank Taylor says

    October 31, 2007 at 3:49 pm

    Well, they have replaced the 3″ resolution imagery with some new aerial imagery. The new stuff is very good quality, but more like 6″ resolution. It also has more shadows than the earlier stuff. But, the new imagery is newer and you can see more new casinos under construction.

  44. B.M.Karlsson says

    October 31, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    Reykjavik is obviously old imagery. Same road constructions going on as last time. Resolution the same. Your information must be wrong.

  45. Jonathan says

    October 31, 2007 at 8:20 pm

    Do you have any way of comparing before-and-after images after imagery updates?

  46. BT14 says

    November 1, 2007 at 1:33 am

    I noticed that downtown Detroit Michigan has been up dated with new imagery and last I checked, it hasn’t been uploaded to google maps yet.

  47. Bill says

    November 1, 2007 at 6:40 pm

    Sweet! They finally updated Atlanta!

  48. CULLY PETTIGREW says

    November 10, 2007 at 10:24 am

    Poor old Scotland has yet to get a major update.
    The West Coast and the Hebrides would benefit.

  49. Joe Rees says

    November 26, 2007 at 1:26 pm

    Good news, But I’m waiting for updates for Manila, Apalit (in Pampanga) and the rest of the Philippines. Please!!!!

  50. Peter says

    December 2, 2007 at 9:39 am

    The maps on the niagara region of Ontario Canada and the overview images of the terrain are over 5 years old. Very very disappointing, I would have thought that google earth would have been updated by now with new terrain images. Life advances quickly on this planet but google does not.

  51. Ganesh Rajan says

    December 4, 2007 at 11:54 am

    ….:(…. Some southern parts of India…(Especially Parts of kerala) are not imaged properly…

  52. Allison says

    December 5, 2007 at 7:09 am

    I am disapointed that Carmarthenshire in Wales (UK) is very low resolution. I wonder when this will be rectified.

  53. Don C says

    January 6, 2008 at 2:05 pm

    Does anyone know why the UK high res stops at the England -Scotland border?

  54. Dez says

    January 15, 2008 at 7:23 pm

    Wow. Almost all the areas I’ve looked at seem to have degraded imagery compared to when I last looked. I can understand the desire to update and provide more recent imagery. I also understand the need to degrade imagery of politically or militarily sensitive locations, but sometimes older, higher-resolution imagery is a damn sight more interesting and/or useful when there are no security implications.

  55. Andy Brown says

    October 19, 2008 at 12:57 pm

    Sorry but the images of parts of Scotland (Perthshire etc) are TERRIBLE and have been for EONS. Can you PLEASE PLEASE find a resolution (LOL) for this.
    Andy Brown.

  56. Mansoor Ahmed says

    May 16, 2009 at 4:46 am

    When Street View will be Available for Leicester?????
    Please do let me know!

  57. Jaycie Works in Wilkes Barre says

    August 4, 2010 at 2:44 pm

    I was so excited when this improvement came out! Like Dan said, Google finally showed wilkes barre some love. first thing I did was look up my office building (http://cititowerwb.com/) lol

  58. Steve says

    December 17, 2010 at 5:41 pm

    Why is southren Scotland such poor resolution?
    when the rest of the UK is good?
    Is there any plans to increase resolution on my favorite part of the world?



PLEASE NOTE: Google Earth Blog is no longer writing regular posts. As a result, we are not accepting new comments or questions about Google Earth. If you have a question, use the official Google Earth and Maps Forums or the Google Earth Community Forums.

Primary Sidebar

RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Twitter




Categories

  • 3D Models (792)
  • Applications (708)
  • Business (288)
  • Environment (353)
  • Flying (208)
  • GE Plugin (282)
  • Google Earth News (1,764)
  • Google Earth Tips (592)
  • GPS (136)
  • Navigation (227)
  • Network Links (214)
  • Sailing (121)
  • Science (499)
  • Sightseeing (1,903)
  • Site News (587)
  • Sky (67)
  • Sports (154)
  • Street View (50)
  • Tours (117)
  • Video (421)
  • Weather (180)

Get new posts by email

Get new posts by email:

Google Earth Satellites

Copyright 2005-© 2023 Frank Taylor. All Rights Reserved.

This blog and its author are not an official source of information from Google that produces and owns Google Earth Google and Google Earth are trademarks of Google Inc.. All image screenshots from Google Earth are Copyright Google. All other trademarks appearing here are the trademarks of their respective owners.

Go to mobile version