• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Google Earth Blog

The amazing things about Google Earth

  • Home
  • About
  • Basics
  • Links
  • Tips
  • 3D Models
  • Sightseeing
  • Videos

Yahoo! Releases 1m-Resolution Imagery for Entire Continental US

April 12, 2006

Last night Yahoo! Maps beta released 1-meter/pixel resolution color satellite photos for the entire continental US. This is significant because it is more consistent data instead of the patchwork of varying color, black and white, varying resolution imagery we are used to in other mapping applications like Google Maps/Earth, and Windows Live Local. Yahoo! now has the best medium resolution dataset for the entire continental US.
According to Cartography the initial release of Yahoo’s beta has some problems in that the imagery is too dark when zoomed out. So, while this is an improvement for many areas, Google Earth still has most populated areas in the US (and other parts of the world) at much higher resolution than 1-meter/pixel. In fact, many in GE are at 1-foot/pixel and even 3 inches/pixel. But, a lot of people are going to run there to see if their houses (which weren’t in high res in Google Maps/Earth) are now available at Yahoo! Maps. What I’m hoping is that this will put some pressure on Google to speed up the release of more high-resolution data in Google Earth. For those who enjoy finding planes in flight, there’s a whole US worth of new data – it’s just not in Google Earth. For those in the US who have been frustrated with low-resolution data, this is an improvement.
Related:

  • Las Vegas at 3 inches/pixel
  • Maldives Island Group in Hi-Res
  • Hi-Res for Torino Olympics
  • Ultimate Google Earth Resolution?

About Frank Taylor

Frank Taylor started the Google Earth Blog in July, 2005 shortly after Google Earth was first released. He has worked with 3D computer graphics and VR for many years and was very impressed with this exciting product. Frank completed a 5.5 year circumnavigation of the earth by sailboat in June 2015 which you can read about at Tahina Expedition, and is a licensed pilot, backpacker, diver, and photographer.

  • More Posts(1963)

Filed Under: Google Earth News

Reader Interactions






PLEASE NOTE: Google Earth Blog is no longer writing regular posts. As a result, we are not accepting new comments or questions about Google Earth. If you have a question, use the official Google Earth and Maps Forums or the Google Earth Community Forums.

Comments

  1. Jonathan says

    April 12, 2006 at 10:35 am

    It appears that Yahoo! simply colorized the ancient USGS DOQQ database. How does the saying go? You can put lipstick on a pig…

  2. Frank Taylor says

    April 12, 2006 at 3:48 pm

    Here’s some interesting comparisons between the new Yahoo! Maps satellite data and Google Maps:
    http://bbs.keyhole.com/ubb/showthreaded.php/Cat/0/Number/384357/page/0/vc/1

  3. Frank Taylor says

    April 12, 2006 at 4:29 pm

    Product manager from Yahoo! Maps comments:
    http://www.digg.com/technology/Yahoo_maps_to_finally_offer_satellite_images#c1446731
    “I’m glad you like the imagery. I know it’s not the best in all areas, but what we’ve put together is a platform with a baseline that was releasable in the beta. To me (and it was my responsibility to pull the trigger on letting people see it), that meant getting a full coverage USA map with as fresh a set of data as we can find, and support of Y! Maps (the USA version) as well as all of the medium resolution international data. From here, it’s really much easier for us to start pushing in more and better stuff. This gives us an opportunity to fire up the servers in order to improve the performance before we go to GA, get some user feedback, and also not just sit on what we’ve already got processed (and trust me, there has been a lot processed and stacks and stacks of disks more to go. 🙂 ) We have a commitment to go forward and continue to put more and more in. Even though we don’t have the very high res online yet for the USA, and we don’t have any of our high resolution international stuff, we will be piling on a ton of new imagery in the coming weeks including very high resolution metros and a ton of very nice international stuff.
    I think this is a good start for our users, and I hope you’ll continue to check in on the beta as we make progress and start hitting on all cylinders.
    Thanks!
    Mike
    Michael Lawless
    Product Manager: Yahoo! Maps”

  4. Siddhartha Gandhi says

    April 12, 2006 at 5:08 pm

    OMFG Are you serious!??@!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????
    That is absolutely crazy. How on earth did they do that???? It takes google so long and it takes yahoo almost no time at all….

  5. Matt says

    April 12, 2006 at 5:25 pm

    I believe Jonathon has it right…
    Compare http://tinyurl.com/ogj9o (Yahoo)
    to http://tinyurl.com/nhm4q (Terraserver USGS DOQQ).
    This is a location in Mt. Pleasant, MI. The large dirt area in the middle of the Yahoo (the upper right in Terraserver) has been built up with apartment buildings for several years now.

  6. Frank Taylor says

    April 12, 2006 at 5:43 pm

    Actually, there are places, like Jonathan said, that have been colorized black and white images found in Terraserver. However, there are also areas that are clearly new color photos (near my house the data is about 6 months newer than that found in Google Earth – a restaurant was being built nearby).
    It’s unclear at this point what percentage is colorized old data, and what percentage is all new.
    If you read the Yahoo Maps manager’s comments, he says they tried for new data as much as possible.

  7. David Ogletree says

    April 13, 2006 at 12:03 am

    They don’t let you zoom in near as much as Google does.

  8. John says

    April 13, 2006 at 11:36 am

    I know in our area, Russell, Ky (Ohio, Ky and WV tri-state area), the yahoo satellite phots are many, many times better than googles. I can zoom in all the way with yahoo, but not with google. And the photos with yahoo are less than a year old, whereas the ones with google are much older. I hope this puts some pressure on google to remember the more rural areas as well as the metro areas.

  9. Dave says

    April 13, 2006 at 11:46 am

    It’s not working for me right now…must be having problems…or i am 🙂

  10. Keith says

    April 13, 2006 at 12:06 pm

    This is very interesting. Is it possible to put bookmarks on the Yahoo Map? This is be pretty useful for users who’d like to indicate the location of buildings and structures or people (friends or relatives) staying on different part of the world.

  11. Lewis Perdue says

    April 13, 2006 at 12:10 pm

    Could not view at all in Mozilla.
    And in IE, there are NO satellite images anywhere near my house.
    I live in Sonoma, CA, north of SanFran … but have plenty of GoogleEarth images.
    I haven’t used much of yahoo! in a very long time and if this expeience is typical, I fcertainly won’t be back in another very long time.

  12. macewan says

    April 13, 2006 at 12:17 pm

    Uses Flash 8 so Linux is out of the game on this site.

  13. Lewis Perdue says

    April 13, 2006 at 12:19 pm

    Update on the sonoma search … still issues with Mozilla, but finally got IE to display area around my house … earlier issue was probably with the Yahoo! server being slow due to people Digging it …
    Still, my house appears about a quarter of an inch on a side while GoogRth image is about four times bigger and great resolution… Yahoo’s image is too small to be of any use … with GoogRth I can cound the trees, see the sidewalk to the front door etc. .. none possible at yahoo … from that, I’d support David Ogletree’s previous post

  14. Zoomer says

    April 13, 2006 at 1:24 pm

    I don’t understand why Google and Yahoo don’t support infinite zoom. Let me decide when it

  15. Rosewood says

    April 13, 2006 at 2:57 pm

    All I know is that for Wichita, KS Yahoo has much better imaging.

  16. Jeremy Kitchen says

    April 13, 2006 at 3:26 pm

    Matt:
    http://tinyurl.com/lzr3n
    this is an area near (interestingly enough) Mt. Pleasant, IA. 5 years ago this intersection didn’t exist, it wasn’t even under construction. Today it’s almost completed. I’d age this photo around 1-2 years old.

  17. Jeremy Kitchen says

    April 13, 2006 at 3:28 pm

    macewan:
    it works here on my linux machine.

  18. Robert Deaton says

    April 13, 2006 at 3:52 pm

    These satellite photos are old… extremely old. My development isn’t even started in this image, and we moved into our house 13 years ago. These images must be at least 15 years old.

  19. Rick says

    April 13, 2006 at 3:54 pm

    The important part here is at least 1m resolution for all the U.S. Google obviuosly beats this is many metro areas, but the imagery in remote areas is vastly superior. Areas that I like to hike in the eastern sierras are now visible in Yahoo where they are just a blur in Google.

  20. Farnsworth says

    April 13, 2006 at 4:12 pm

    How does anyone know how secure flash 8 is? What are the specs? What information does it give the server? What “features” can I turn off, like no cookies!
    Why do people just think flash is so safe? Did people just go stupid?
    At least with HTML we know what to expect, flash allows these companies to take more control over the situation. The control is now on their end and they are programming your computer from remote, always a bad thing!



PLEASE NOTE: Google Earth Blog is no longer writing regular posts. As a result, we are not accepting new comments or questions about Google Earth. If you have a question, use the official Google Earth and Maps Forums or the Google Earth Community Forums.

Primary Sidebar

RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Twitter




Categories

  • 3D Models (792)
  • Applications (708)
  • Business (288)
  • Environment (353)
  • Flying (208)
  • GE Plugin (282)
  • Google Earth News (1,764)
  • Google Earth Tips (592)
  • GPS (136)
  • Navigation (227)
  • Network Links (214)
  • Sailing (121)
  • Science (499)
  • Sightseeing (1,903)
  • Site News (587)
  • Sky (67)
  • Sports (154)
  • Street View (50)
  • Tours (117)
  • Video (421)
  • Weather (180)

Get new posts by email

Get new posts by email:

Google Earth Satellites

Copyright 2005-© 2022 Frank Taylor. All Rights Reserved.

This blog and its author are not an official source of information from Google that produces and owns Google Earth Google and Google Earth are trademarks of Google Inc.. All image screenshots from Google Earth are Copyright Google. All other trademarks appearing here are the trademarks of their respective owners.