I used the "Contact Formular" at 2011.11.26 - 00:00 UT.
I was not the first ...?! DAMN :D

Ok new Stuff:
Klietz, Nauen, Schwerin, Germany
Hamneda, Sweden
Margarites, Malia, (Crete), Greece
Monopoli, Italy
Chauffailles, Amplepuis, France
Donja Suvaja, Bosnia Herzigowina
Area arout Warschau, Poland
La Puebla de Montalbán, Spain

(more in E-Mail i sent)

Bad Oeynhausen,Dissen am Teutoburger Wald, Germany
Daruvar, Croatia

danyang,zhenjiang,jiangsu provience,china

yiyang,henan,china

etc.

France: Bergerac, Auch (southern part of the town), Billy (southern part of Allier).

USA, Pennsylvania: Erie, Indiana and Scranton
(yes, there is an Indiana, PA)

New York: Binghamton, Albany,

Oregon: Roseburg

California: Lancaster, Merced, Bishop, Redding

Idaho: Mountain Home

Colorado: Breckenridge, Alamosa, Las Animas

New Mexico: Clayton

Oklahoma: Boise City, Guymon, Lawton, Oklahoma City, McAlester, Bartlesville

Kansas: Great Bend

Texas: Fredericksburg, Texarkana

Arkansas: Hot Springs National Park

Missouri: Springfield

South Carolina: Lake City

Pennsylvania: Altoona

New York: Jamestown, Oneonta

USA:
Arkansas: Okmulgee and Hot Springs
Oklahoma: Goodwell and Boise City
New Mexico: Clayton

heh, I was a little late on that last one, though Okmulgee wasn't in Steven's list so it wasn't a total duplicate. :)

south of mihailesti in giurgiu conty Romania..15th march 2011 imagery

south of ploiesti romania 20th april 2011

India: Kalyan and Navi Mumbai (same long strip of new imagery)

Wrong information:
- Toruń, Poland - it's not New Google Earth Imagery, the same are in Google MAps and Earth.

Are all the Imagery Updated all at once? or you update an area and 5 minutes later, you update another area? I was just wondering

Poland:

- Żuławy Wiślane, Poland (area from Gdańsk to Elbląg)

- Pruszcz Gdański, Elbląg, Malbork, Kwidzyn, Iława, Ostróda, Brodnica, Mława, Płock, Ciechanów, Wyszków

Message in Polish to @Jakub i @Wojtuś
Ja mu napisałem, że chodzi o teren pomiędzy Płockiem, Toruniem, Warszawą i Gdańskiem, ale widać autor źle mnie zrozumiał.

UK (Northern Ireland)
Area between Coleraine and Ballymoney

MEXICO:

Campeche City
Tizimin, Yucatan
Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas
Quiroga, Michoacan
South of Guanajuato

UK: Greenock, Scotland

Northern Ireland: Bushmills

The imagery covers a huge area, but is rather low resolution. It looks like they wanted to cover a large area with something better than the 15m Landsat images. (though it does cover up some other slightly better satellite images)

Okmulgee is in Oklahoma, not Arkansas

It's a bad habit of mine to not always pull out and double-check to see if I slipped across a State line.

Italy: Sarzana and Fivizzano

Italy: Anguillara Sabazia, Monterotondo, Albano Laziale, Bitonto, and San Giuliano Terme

These are Digital Globe satellite updates. Some are just single tiles while others are reasonably long strips.

South Korea: Mokpo

Note that there are quite a few areas in South Korea that have been given a color balance, but the image itself isn't new. Examples would be Masanhappo-gu, the Chinhae Naval Base (near Deoksan-dong), and the north-east part of Seoul.

Kuršumlija, Serbia (5/7/2011).

SCOTLAND - the new imagery in the Greenock/Dunfermline area west of Glasgow is very dark and of much lower quality than the imagery replaced - best to look at historical imagery if you are interested in this area - and it raises the continuing issue of quality control at GE (does anyone look at this stuff?)

IRELAND - despite a patch of new medium res, over coloured imagery in the Coleraine area, but not the strip containing the town, the imagery in nearly all parts of Ireland is still a mess, surprising when there is complete Street View coverage, and improvement is overdue.

Japan: Hongucho Ukegawa

Germany: Klietz,Nauen,Schwerin

France: Beaugency

SPAIN: A large area of "Valles Pasiegos, Cantabria, Spain". "Villacarriedo" is the town situated in the center of the updated are.

The KML/KMZ for the 25 November updates has arrived.

What it shows is very disappointing as much of the new imagery in Germany, France and elsewhere in Europe is much darker, much less coloured, and is no higher res than the imagery replaced and still viewable as 'historic' (as previous comment re Ireland).

No explanation from Google of course, but can any GEB reader throw more light on what is going on?

HA!
NOW they updated the KMZ with the new Imagery from 10th of November!

more imformation:
http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2011/11/new_google_earth_imagery_-_november_4.html

Greatz, Andreas

@ Andreas - not yet in the automatically delivered updates in the 'my places' section of layers ... very confusing ... or is it all in the 25 November KMZ ?

@Chris - The new imagery from 10th of November and 25th of November are both in the "25 November" Folder of the Google KMZ.

Can you please update an area in Central Connecticut? Its been over a year.

The 10th of November-update still is a strange thing. Three towns in France were mentioned in your blogpost as being part of that update:
- Libourne
- Naucelle
- Bourgoin-Jallieu
When I visit these towns in GE now, I see the imageray is dated:
- Libourne: 7-3-2011
- Naucelle and Bourgoin-Jallieu: 15-4-2011

So the imagery is from spring 2011. But if I open all the previous updates of 2011 (from January till now) in the imagery_updates.kml, I do not find these places as being updated this year.

So they have been updated without ever being part of the KML. Strange....

Germany: München,Stuttgart,Hamburg