More 3D trees added to Google Earth; Boulder, Denver and Los Angeles

The addition of trees to Google Earth 6 was an awesome enhancement that made some big cities in Google Earth look remarkably more realistic. While they’re rolling out at a fairly slow pace, it’s nice to see Google continue to push it out to a few more cities.
The newest cities to get the trees are Boulder and Denver, Colorado and Los Angeles, California.
The new trees in Denver are of particular interest to me. I wrote a post on Digital Earth Blog more than three years ago comparing Denver in Google Earth and Microsoft’s (then-titled) Virtual Earth. At the time, Virtual Earth looked far better than Google Earth thanks to the trees. However, Google Earth has blown way past the look of Virtual Earth thanks to the improvements in satellite imagery and 3D buildings in the past few years.
First, here’s a look at the Colorado State Captiol building in Google Earth circa 2007. There are a few modeled buildings, a handful of gray buildings, and certainly no 3D trees:

ge-denver-2007.jpg

Next, here’s a shot from Virtual Earth, also in 2007. There are quite a few more 3D rendered buildings, but the textures on them aren’t very sharp. The trees are a nice touch, though:
ve-denver-2007.jpg

Finally, here’s a look at the same view in Google Earth, as seen today. The buildings are amazingly sharp, and the trees look far more realistic than what we saw in Virtual Earth in the past:
ge-denver-2011.jpg

This comparison helps to show why Google is taking so long between cities with the addition of 3D trees — they’re doing it right. Rather than clumps of virtually identical trees like you saw in Virtual Earth, they’re taking the time to get the right species and height of each tree. The results speak for themselves.
To see these new trees, simply search for Boulder, Denver or Los Angeles in your Google Earth search window and make sure you have [Trees] enabled in the [3D Buildings] layer.
(via Google Lat Long Blog)

About Mickey Mellen

Mickey has been using Google Earth since it was released in 2005, and has created a variety of geo-related sites including Google Earth Hacks. He runs a web design firm in Marietta, GA, where he lives with his wife and two kids.



Comments

  1. Español:
    Deberían hacer una aplicación como Building Maker para colocar arboles en Google Earth, Google lo apruebe (como en Google SketchUp) para quedar seleccionado como modelo de Google Earth en la capa “Arboles”
    English:
    Should make an application as Building Maker to put trees on Google Earth, Google approves (how in Google SketchUp) to be selected as a model for Google Earth in layer “Trees ”

  2. wroman — I agree completely. That would be excellent.

  3. Planting artificial trees should be a very low priority for Google when there is considerable scope for improving GE imagery in all parts of the world.

  4. Chris — Good point. However, I assume they have separate people assigned to help process imagery vs. those working on trees. Plus, wroman’s suggestion could allow for more of us to work on trees while they continue to focus on imagery.

Leave a Reply