I like the airport at Frankfurt Germany, as for some reason there are 3 Luftansa 747s taking off almost in some sort of a formation. You can see them (and their shadows) just to the east of the main runway (at least on maps.google.com).

I took a look at those planes at Frankfurt International, and something very weird is happening there... I think they may all be the same plane.
Check out the traffic below the middle plane. The shadow indicates the sun is in the south west.

Notice the shadows of each of the three planes (which are north and slightly east of the planes). You can't see a shadow for the eastern-most plane (maybe the plane has gained enough altitude to lose its shadow, or its the terrain). The shadow for the middle plane is hard to see, its not on flat surface, but it is there. The western-most plane has the most distinct shadow.

But if you keep looking west, there are 2 more shadows of planes... and there's nothing there making these shadows! (its either that... or, if the 1st shadow is the first plane's shadow, then those shadows indicate that the sun is in the north east... which is the opposite of what the traffic's shadows tell us.)

I think maybe this planet could be an imposter!

I haven't seen an airplane on Google Earth before, but isn't it weird that the shadow of the airplane seems to be over the airplane itself? Look closely, specially at the shadow of the tail section.

umm... Sinan... read the story.

cm and andrew: the plane(s) in Frankfurt, Germany are a differnt kind of aerial photo artifact. In this case, the same plane is captured several times because of the scanning process. The plane is faster than the photo capture so it gets captured several times. In one case, the composite image is missing the shadow of the plane (because the plane was gone before that portion of the photo was taken).

I saw a similar view (from the ground) two weeks ago when my Wife and I were camping near this location. I commented to her about the two planes mating.

The photo of the north runway at London's Heathrow airport shows the sample multiple-plane effect very clearly.

Normally Air Refueling is conducted at an altitude around 27000. In the shot of the KC-135 and C-5 you still see the aircraft when you get down to around 6000 feet. I have no doubt that this is a photo of an inflight refueling, but why the anomaly?

CrewRest - all the aerial/satellite photos are 2D pictures mapped onto the Google Earth terrain. Although the planes were at altitude, they are not 3D so the image is mapped at the same height as the ground.

So far I've found a small plane over the water in Southern California, a U-2 over the runway up north and a heliocopter over the ocean down south. This is the neatest tool I've ever used. If anybody wants to see the planes I found, post back. It would seem to be more fun to look by yourself than just be told where they are exactly.

I have the latest version of GE, according to the "check for updates" feature in Help, and the image I have of that is incredibly blurry. Are you using a professional version or something?

(silly antispam, a is A)

In this case, I chose to process the screenshot image to sharpen it a bit (because
of the blurriness). So, my image of the scene was also blurry when viewed this close.

All versions of Google Earth (even the Pro version) use the same data set. So, you
get the best images Google has available with the free version.

Re: "blue ghost"
I wonder about the explanation above. Why would the ghost be *ahead* of the plane if it is an artifact of its motion? Note that this shot was taken over water (Tule Lake), could the "ghost" really be a reflection of the planes off the water surface? Just food for thought.

Does anyone know about how close we are to getting real time images or at least within the past couple of days old?

Very nice... those who want can also see a plane leaving Congonhas airport in Sao Paulo, Brazil. I think it's an A320, from TAM airlines, at 23d 38'46.59" S 46d 38'34.49" W. Enjoy it.

Checkout: 34deg 56' 59.42"N / 115deg 15' 41.31"W

Jet Fighter?

I just found this myself. I'm a nature photographer, and I shoot at Tule Lake a lot. I thought it might be a relic of WWI or something, since the area has a lot of history. It's too small for scale though.

Wild!

I first thought it was a hoax (I don't even know if that's possible), so I measured the lat/long of the nose and tail of the C-5A and calculated the distance - the result I got was 79.4 meters, and the actual length of a C-5A is 75.3 - close enough!

The Jet Fighter is 20.2 meters long, consistent with what a jet fighter could be - it is also in the vicinity of Edwards AFB.

Jim G: Jet fighters haven't had straight wings since the ME 262.

It appears to be a 4 engine cargo plane to me, possibly a C-130.

On Friday July 6th while sitting in my brother-in-laws yard in Columbia, Connecticut with in an hour till dusk we heard the kids screaming, "Look, their glued together." Sure enough it looked like two passenger airliners stuck together. Many adults commented they were making little planes, lol. Well, the kids and I would like someone to shed some light on this for us. Was this a refuling? Do they do this over residential areas?

It's a C-5 (probably a B-model)behind a KC-135 in precontact position southbound on AR-7A between FL240 - FL310. Probably FL250 (25,000')

Air Refueling Track 7A is a standard air refueling track that runs from central Oregon to north of Sacremento. AR7A runs southbound ... AR7B its mirror is offset about 50nm to the west and runs northbound. It is the primary AR training track for Travis AFB based C-5Bs.

If you go look at the Travis AFB in Fairfield, CA to the south you will find 9 C-5s ... 12 KC-10s ... a lone transit C-130 ... and on the other side of the base across runways 21R and 21L on a hardstand is the west coast alert E6B TACAMO. TACAMO provides US Navy with backup ELF communications for the balistic missile sub fleet.

33°57'54.50"N 79° 6'22.42"W I went to a flight school that is a little over 9 miles to the south south-west. It's a Cessna 152 that is flying over our practice area. I wish I could see the tail number.

Its not a fighter, I would say its a lear jet.

Look at 38.913516N 91.031955W for a jet on probable approach to Lambert Field in St. Louis.

Hey all, new to the blog but seriously intrigued with GE. I love to fly, had a C-152 25 years ago. Retired now and able to spend my time doing anything I like. I land travel and also metal detect with a fever. I spend endless hours on GE.
I have a question though. The areas that have large blocks that are of different colors, are these edited areas? How much IS edited? Some areas can be zoomed close enough to read signs and some are very poor, in comparison.

RE: Different colo'u'red blocks.

Not all the photography of an area is done on one day, possibly only a small section at a time (150km in length) they can be taken at different times of day, this is how you get the different light levels and the 'change' of colour.

As for the more detailed areas, the only highly detailed areas are the ones with high population. To save costs they probably don't bother capturing sections that they think people won't look at.

And of course, if you are into conspiracies then they could be hiding stuff from us...you never know.

I just checked the kmz and I don't see planes there. Have they been removed?